Friday, August 05, 2005

 

Which is it?

Here are two starkly different views of the impact of a reduction of U.S. forces in Iraq.

From Agence France-Presse,

Newsweek reported Sunday that Washington plans to reduce troop levels to 80,000 by mid next year and to 60,000 by the end of 2006.

Fewer US troops on the ground is likely to mean fewer casualties -- and less of an incendiary presence for insurgents.

Politically, a partial US withdrawal would allow Bush to point to progress in Iraq ahead of the 2006 elections.

From a soldier,

If we pull out immediately, it's likely the Iraqi security forces will not be able to provide stability on their own. In that event, the new Iraqi government could possibly be overthrown. The other option would be to reduce our troop numbers and have a gradual pullout. That is very risky because it seems that even with the current number of troops the violence still continues. With a significant troop reduction, there is a strong possibility the violence and attacks on US and coalition forces could escalate and get even worse. In my opinion, that is more of a certainty.

Post a Comment

<< Simply Appalling Home

Atom feed

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com
Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Blog Search Engine

Politics
Blog Top Sites

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?